2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2157417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a New Measure of Skewness for Unimodal Distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Das et al . (), F 1 is a homogeneously right‐skewed distribution, and so μ cannot be chosen as an appropriate central value θ , because of the negative value of Sμ(F1). However, when mode M is used as a central value, SM(F1)=0 indicates no left skewness (Figure , dotted line).…”
Section: Measuring Positive and Negative Skewnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Das et al . (), F 1 is a homogeneously right‐skewed distribution, and so μ cannot be chosen as an appropriate central value θ , because of the negative value of Sμ(F1). However, when mode M is used as a central value, SM(F1)=0 indicates no left skewness (Figure , dotted line).…”
Section: Measuring Positive and Negative Skewnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of studying the skewness of a distribution by means of a function is found, for instance, in Das et al . (), where the skewness function is defined as γf(x)=f(M+x)f(Mx),1emx>0. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors have proposed and obtained different descriptive elements to measure skewness (see, for instance, [8][9][10][11][12][13]). Ref [10] suggested a measurement of skewness corresponding to the (unique) mode, M, given by the following index:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%