1988
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620260710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a non‐linear formulation for curved Timoshenko beam elements considering large displacement/rotation increments

Abstract: SUMMARYAn incremental Total Lagrangian Formulation for curved beam elements that includes the effect of large rotation increments is developed. A complete and symmetric tangent stiffness matrix is obtained and the numerical results show, in general, an improvement over the standard formulation where the assumption of infinitesimal rotation increments is made in the derivation of the tangent stiffness matrix.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5). The coil is discretized by a set of degenerated beam elements (e.g., Bathe, 1996;Dvorkin et al, 1988) based on Timoshenko beam theory, in which the deformation in the cross-section of the beam is assumed to be negligible. Schematic description of the beam element is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Coil Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(5). The coil is discretized by a set of degenerated beam elements (e.g., Bathe, 1996;Dvorkin et al, 1988) based on Timoshenko beam theory, in which the deformation in the cross-section of the beam is assumed to be negligible. Schematic description of the beam element is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Description Of the Coil Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For detailed explanation about this beam element, one can find in (Bathe, 1996;Dvorkin et al, 1988;Hisada and Noguchi, 1995). …”
Section: V(v1 V2 V3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to account for the spread of yielding, numerical integration over the cross-section is also required. In this case, one of the advantages of Reissner-Simo beam theory over the so-called continuum based (or degenerate continuum) approach [33][34][35] is lost. Nevertheless, plastic behaviour in beams is often restricted to localized areas (e.g.…”
Section: The Constitutive Law and The Reference Conÿgurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U 1 , U 3 and Z 1 are strain and change of curvature vectors, the variations of which are deÿned in the preceding section by equation (20).…”
Section: Virtual Work Of Stressesmentioning
confidence: 99%