Abstract:We present a 9-node ®nite element for compressible¯ow solutions. A high-order derivative upwind term and a shock capturing term are employed for stability and accuracy of the formulation. We give the solutions of various example problems to illustrate our experiences with the element. Ó
“…7. It can be observed that the solution obtained with the initial mesh is close to the results obtained by Hendriana and Bathe (2000) with reference to the position of the shock wave as well as its intensity. Results obtained by Le Beau et al (1993) are not shown in Fig.…”
“…7. It can be observed that the solution obtained with the initial mesh is close to the results obtained by Hendriana and Bathe (2000) with reference to the position of the shock wave as well as its intensity. Results obtained by Le Beau et al (1993) are not shown in Fig.…”
“…This technique involves adding a higher order derivative artificial diffusion term to the Galerkin formulation for greater accuracy and stability [4],…”
Section: Higher Order Derivative Artificial Diffusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pure Galerkin formulation is realized in the limit of very fine discretization. In references [4,7,13] the factor C ¼ 1 9 was used for the one-dimensional FEM, derived analytically. The calculation of C for the MFS is more involved and is presented in Appendix A.…”
Section: Higher Order Derivative Artificial Diffusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13) are calculated. This derivation follows the one used by [4,7,13] to calculate their factor of C ¼ 1 9 for the Ho DAD method used with parabolic finite elements. The one-dimensional case that was used to determine the value of C, for a given nodal distribution and Peclet number, will be described.…”
Section: Appendix A: Ho Dad Artificial Diffusion Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The basic idea of upwind methods is to give upstream nodes more weight than downstream nodes, thus dealing more effectively with the convective terms. A few of the more popular upwind techniques are the Galerkin Least-Squares (GLS) method [2], the Streamline Upwind/Petrov Galerkin (SUPG) method [3] and the Higher Order Derivative Artificial Diffusion (Ho DAD) method [4].…”
In this paper we compare several numerical methods for the solution of the convection-diffusion equation using the method of finite spheres; a truly meshfree numerical technique for the solution of boundary value problems. By conducting numerical infsup tests on a one-dimensional model problem it is found that a higher order derivative artificial diffusion (Ho DAD) method performs the best among the schemes tested. This method is then applied to the analysis of problems in two-dimensions.
SUMMARYWe study the performance of various upwind techniques implemented in parabolic ÿnite element discretizations for incompressible high Reynolds number ow. The characteristics of an 'ideal' upwind procedure are ÿrst discussed. Then the streamline upwind Petrov=Galerkin method, a simpliÿed version thereof, the Galerkin least squares technique and a high-order derivative artiÿcial di usion method are evaluated on test problems. We conclude that none of the methods displays the desired solution characteristics. There is still need for the development of a reliable and e cient upwind method with characteristics close to those of the 'ideal' procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.