2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a pursuit for perfecting an undergraduate requirements engineering course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the results obtained in this research show a significant tendency in which the flipped-classroom has a significant effect in performance. Thus, similar results and conclusions are informed in an engineering course [13,14] where students' performance were significantly higher with a flipped-classroom model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the results obtained in this research show a significant tendency in which the flipped-classroom has a significant effect in performance. Thus, similar results and conclusions are informed in an engineering course [13,14] where students' performance were significantly higher with a flipped-classroom model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, the final exam results of students who followed the flipped-classroom model were improved and represented students' conceptual and theoretical understanding of the subjects and contents. In an engineering senior class, similar findings were performed and reported [13,14]. In addition, this research denotes that more teaching materials and resources were used when a flipped-classroom was followed.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…See the Supporting Information for examples from non-STEM disciplines. Examples of specifications grading systems in STEM courses in peer-reviewed journals and conference papers come from engineering, computer science, mathematics, biological sciences, ,− physics, , and chemistry. ,, In the chemistry discipline, our pilot study is the only publication that specifically describes implementing specifications grading in a standalone laboratory course . To date, most published implementations of specifications grading represent small courses with enrollments of 100 or fewer students, and no examples exist of specifications grading used in courses with enrollments of greater than 1,000 students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See the Supporting Information for examples from non-STEM disciplines. Examples of specifications grading systems in STEM courses in peer-reviewed journals and conference papers come from engineering, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] computer science, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] mathematics, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] biological sciences, 25,[32][33][34] physics, 25,35 and chemistry. 1,25,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] In the chemistry discipline, our pilot study is the only publication that specifically describes implementing specifications grading in a standalone laboratory course.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%