1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00681558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a relationship between stretched zone parameters and fracture toughness of ductile structural steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static tests results agree well with the data from [16] for the same 15H2NMFA steel of another melt: subcritical crack growth in 12 to 20 mm thick specimens was observed at the temperature above 225 K.…”
Section: Fracture Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The static tests results agree well with the data from [16] for the same 15H2NMFA steel of another melt: subcritical crack growth in 12 to 20 mm thick specimens was observed at the temperature above 225 K.…”
Section: Fracture Mechanismsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the case of dynamic loading, at a test temperature below 183 K the stretched zone could not be found, while in the case of static loading the stretched zone could be observed even at 78 K. Similarly to Fig. 5, the temperature shift of static and dynamic curves relative to each other constitutes over 100 K. Small scatter of the experimental points should also be noted as compared to the stereofractographic examination results of the stretched zone only on one side of the fracture surface [16]. At the same time, for the steel 15H2NMFA of two different melts investigated, good agreement is observed of the average 2h values obtained in [16] and the 2h values in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Krasowsky [25,26] and his colleagues showed clearly that the stretch height is not symmetrically divided on the two fracture surfaces. Because the crack usually grows from the blunted zone at an angle to the nominal fracture plane, the deformation left on one of the surfaces may be quite different on the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%