2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-011-0235-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Stochastic Trotter Formula with Application to Spontaneous Localization Models

Abstract: We consider the relation between so called continuous localization models -i.e. non-linear stochastic Schrödinger evolutions -and the discrete GRW-model of wave function collapse. The former can be understood as scaling limit of the GRW process. The proof relies on a stochastic Trotter formula , which is of interest in its own right. Our Trotter formula also allows to complement results on existence theory of stochastic Schrödinger evolutions by Holevo and Mora/Rebolledo.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…λ gives the frequency of the localization events for a reference object of mass m 0 = 1 amu, while r C describes how well an object is localized. The QMUPL model has only the parameter η, which can be related to the GRW/CSL parameters [20]. A common open question of both the GRW and CSL models, is to explain the origin of the noise in the dynamical equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λ gives the frequency of the localization events for a reference object of mass m 0 = 1 amu, while r C describes how well an object is localized. The QMUPL model has only the parameter η, which can be related to the GRW/CSL parameters [20]. A common open question of both the GRW and CSL models, is to explain the origin of the noise in the dynamical equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 3 In a Banach space version of the proposition, the condition iL 2 is self-adjoint should be replaced by L 2 is a generator of isometries. The proof is technically more involved and requires a version of Trotter-Kato formula that does not seem to be available in the literature ( [12] assumes compact state space, while [8,6] assume the Hilbert space structure). In particular that if dL j , j = 1, 2 is the generator of a propagator U j (s, s ′ ), then the propagator U(s, s ′ ) generated by a sum dL 1 + dL 2 can be expressed as…”
Section: Assumptions and Basic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Writing γ = (β + ||X|| 2 ∞ )/(1 − 2α||X|| 2 ∞ ) and choosing the optimal α = 1/(4||X|| 2 ∞ ) we get Bound (6).…”
Section: A Two-sided Stochastic Calculusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to do that, we will refer to another collapse model, the Quantum Mechanics with Universal Position Localizations (QMUPL) model [26,27]. The connection between the GRW and the QMUPL model has been studied in [28],…”
Section: Many Particle Systems: the Classical Limit In Bohmian Mecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collapse regime: In a very short time an arbitrary initial wave function localizes in space according to the Born rule. The collapse time, from an arbitrary initial wave function to a wavefunction of spread l, can be quantified as t C = 3 2l 2 Λ QMUPL , where Λ QMUPL = Λ/r 2 C in an appropriate limit as discussed in [28]. For example, let us consider a sphere of radius R = 1mm in the Earth's atmosphere as described in section IV: (1/ √ 2)r C = λ th = 3 · 10 −12 m and Λ = η = 3, 6 × 10 22 s −1 .…”
Section: Many Particle Systems: the Classical Limit In Bohmian Mecmentioning
confidence: 99%