2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a subfactor generalization of Wallʼs conjecture

Abstract: In this paper we discuss a conjecture on intermediate subfactors which is a generalization of Wall's conjecture from the theory of finite groups. We explore special cases of this conjecture and present supporting evidence. In particular we prove special cases of this conjecture related to some finite dimensional Kac algebras of Izumi-Kosaki type which include relative version of Wall's conjecture for solvable groups.Published by Elsevier Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the above characterization of coideal subalgebras the proof of this Theorem is the same as that of Theorem 3.8 from [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the above characterization of coideal subalgebras the proof of this Theorem is the same as that of Theorem 3.8 from [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This is compensated by the new characterization of coideal subalgebras given in Theorem 2.1. Also a Hopf algebraic version of the Conjecture 1.1 formulated in [4] follows for cocentral Kac algebras of solvable groups, see Subsection 3.6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [20,21] and [7], Conjecture 1.1 is verified for subfactors coming from certain conformal field theories and subfactors which are more closely related to groups and more generally Hopf algebras. The subfactors considered in these papers are finite depth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…When N ⊂ M comes from group G and its subgroup H, Conjecture 1.1 states that the number of maximal subgroups of G containing H is less than n 1.5 , where n is the number of double cosets of H in G, and it is proved to be true for solvable group G in [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%