Proceedings of First International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico 2006
DOI: 10.2523/104076-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a Well-Test Pressure Theory of Analysis for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, Considering Transient Interporosity Matrix, Microfractures, Vugs, and Fractures Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different carbonate reservoirs have different development degrees of fracture and vug (Mai and Kantzas 2007), so different carbonate reservoirs have different fluid dynamics, and a task of researchers is establishing various test models supplied to users to evaluate the properties of the underground reservoir. So far, there are many theoretical models for the flow of underground oil in multiple media reservoirs (Braester 1984, Abdassah and Ershaghi 1986, Jalali and Ershaghi 1987, Al-Ghamdi and Ershaghi 1996, Bui et al 2000, Camacho-Vela´zquez et al 2005, Pulido et al 2006, Gua and Chalaturnyk 2010, and although there are many papers about the dual media reservoir and triple media reservoir, in their papers, the manner of interporosity flow is pseudo-steady for both matrix to fracture and vugs to fracture, and the shape of the matrix and vug may be arbitrary because the governing equation of the matrix and vug for pseudo-steady inter-porosity flow has no relationship with the coordinate r. In addition, there are some papers about the unsteady inter-porosity flow (Warren and Root 1963, Bourdet and Gringarten 1980, Wijesinghe and Culham 1984, Wijesinghe and Kececioglu 1985, Rasmussen and Civan 2003, Izadi and Yildiz 2007. In their papers, the research object is the dual media reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different carbonate reservoirs have different development degrees of fracture and vug (Mai and Kantzas 2007), so different carbonate reservoirs have different fluid dynamics, and a task of researchers is establishing various test models supplied to users to evaluate the properties of the underground reservoir. So far, there are many theoretical models for the flow of underground oil in multiple media reservoirs (Braester 1984, Abdassah and Ershaghi 1986, Jalali and Ershaghi 1987, Al-Ghamdi and Ershaghi 1996, Bui et al 2000, Camacho-Vela´zquez et al 2005, Pulido et al 2006, Gua and Chalaturnyk 2010, and although there are many papers about the dual media reservoir and triple media reservoir, in their papers, the manner of interporosity flow is pseudo-steady for both matrix to fracture and vugs to fracture, and the shape of the matrix and vug may be arbitrary because the governing equation of the matrix and vug for pseudo-steady inter-porosity flow has no relationship with the coordinate r. In addition, there are some papers about the unsteady inter-porosity flow (Warren and Root 1963, Bourdet and Gringarten 1980, Wijesinghe and Culham 1984, Wijesinghe and Kececioglu 1985, Rasmussen and Civan 2003, Izadi and Yildiz 2007. In their papers, the research object is the dual media reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33–35] investigated a triple continuum pressure transient model for a naturally fractured vuggy reservoir, and Pulido et al. [22] established a well‐test pressure theory of analysis for naturally fractured reservoirs, considering transient interporosity matrix, micro fractures, vugs, and fractures flow, Cai et al. [4] investigated dynamic analysis for pressure in limit conductivity vertical fracture wells of triple‐porosity reservoir, Nie et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Rodriguez et al [2004] proposed analytical solutions with stationary exchanges between two nested sets of fractures and a porous matrix. Pulido et al [2006] addressed solutions for modeling transient exchanges, including the skin effect, between a fracture network, a microfracture network and a porous matrix assuming that microfractures are unconnected on a large scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%