2009
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-09-05053-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On abstract Strichartz estimates and the Strauss conjecture for nontrapping obstacles

Abstract: Abstract. We establish the Strauss conjecture concerning small-data global existence for nonlinear wave equations, in the setting of exterior domains to compact obstacles, for space dimensions n = 3 and 4. The obstacle is assumed to be nontrapping, and the solution is assumed to satisfy either Dirichlet or Neumann conditions along the boundary of the obstacle. The key step in the proof is establishing certain "abstract Strichartz estimates" for the linear wave equation on exterior domains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first ones are local energy estimates for the solution without a derivative and are obtained by appropriately dividing through by a derivative and using a variant of a Sobolev embedding. These are collected from [2], [7], and [25]. The second class of estimates apply to small, timedependent perturbations of ✷ and, as stated, are from [24] but are heavily influenced by the preceding works [30], [23].…”
Section: Jason Metcalfe and Katrina Morganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first ones are local energy estimates for the solution without a derivative and are obtained by appropriately dividing through by a derivative and using a variant of a Sobolev embedding. These are collected from [2], [7], and [25]. The second class of estimates apply to small, timedependent perturbations of ✷ and, as stated, are from [24] but are heavily influenced by the preceding works [30], [23].…”
Section: Jason Metcalfe and Katrina Morganmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case when potential V = 0 is proved in [9]. The case with V as in (2.6) can be proved by adapting the argument in [15, Proposition 5.1], which is performed for = 1 to dimension d = 2 + 3.…”
Section: Iii-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant difference to the initial value problem is the effect of reflection at the boundary and the lack of symmetry such as scale-invariance, rotation-invariance and so on. For the existence of global-in-time solutions to (1.1) has been discussed in Du-Metcalfe-Sogge-Zhou [2] and Hidano-Metcalfe-Smith-Sogge-Zhou [3] when p S (N ) < p < N +3 N −1 and N = 3, 4. The sharp lower bounds for lifespan of solutions are shown in Yu [17] 2 < p < p S (3) with N = 3; Zhou-Han [19] proved sharp upper bounds in the case 1 < p < p S (N ) and N ≥ 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%