2014
DOI: 10.1002/ocea.5046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Academic Foucauldian-dramaturgy and Modernity in Melanesia

Abstract: This short paper offers a critical reflection on the uses of Michel Foucault's ideas and the notion ofLet me make clear from the outset that in what follows I differentiate sharply between Foucault himself and the ways his ideas are applied by so many anthropologists -especially those writing about Melanesian life-worlds. As for Foucault himself, I find his writings limited within the compass of his own inquiry and by no means do I take him as an authority on the matters of power, epistemology, sexuality, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It then presents case studies of two indigenous groups—Venezuelan Pume and Ecuadorian Shuar—who have spurned incentives to claim indigeneity and instead organized their political action predominantly in line with indigenous notions of “power” and conventional forms of social organization. These ethnographies highlight both the limits to the post‐structural political anthropology that developed in the neoliberal era (see Cepek, 2011; Mimica, 2014) as well as contributing to emerging reconceptualizations of cultures of politics, without denying that different groups’ ability to organize and act autonomously and thereby express cultural forms and preferences is impacted by local and supralocal material conditions.…”
Section: Introduction: Cultures Of Politics or The Politics Of Culture?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It then presents case studies of two indigenous groups—Venezuelan Pume and Ecuadorian Shuar—who have spurned incentives to claim indigeneity and instead organized their political action predominantly in line with indigenous notions of “power” and conventional forms of social organization. These ethnographies highlight both the limits to the post‐structural political anthropology that developed in the neoliberal era (see Cepek, 2011; Mimica, 2014) as well as contributing to emerging reconceptualizations of cultures of politics, without denying that different groups’ ability to organize and act autonomously and thereby express cultural forms and preferences is impacted by local and supralocal material conditions.…”
Section: Introduction: Cultures Of Politics or The Politics Of Culture?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lesson I take from Wall Street is that there may be wild inflation of the erroneous and the empty by which I mean not just Strathern's ‘dividual’ but also the myriad ‘afterologies’ that have devolved from Lévi‐Strauss' structuralism, especially anything inspired by Jacques Derrida or Michel Foucault ( cf . Mimica, in press). ‘Junk’ may soar and it is foolish to sit back and wait for the marketplace of ideas to self‐correct because, at least in the middle term, the operation of a general consensus in the general interest is a mirage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%