2012
DOI: 10.1177/0021998311413622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On acquiring data for large-scale crack bridging at high strain rates

Abstract: Numerical simulations are used to design test geometries and loading histories that are suitable for probing the large-scale bridging effects of through-thickness reinforcement that is shearing at high strain rates. The bridging effects are represented by a cohesive law and tests are sought that will determine any rate dependence in its parameters. The end-notched flexure test is studied, because it allows easy application of time-dependent loading and has proven to be an information-rich test in the quasi-sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…uses the Finite Element Method and cohesive interface elements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Damage within the layers may be accounted for using continuum damage approaches which modify the elastic constants of the layers when damage progresses.…”
Section: The Most Common Numerical Technique To Analyze Delamination mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…uses the Finite Element Method and cohesive interface elements [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Damage within the layers may be accounted for using continuum damage approaches which modify the elastic constants of the layers when damage progresses.…”
Section: The Most Common Numerical Technique To Analyze Delamination mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There the concentrated load generates a compression region which typically arrests the cracks in quasi static laboratory experiments. Here the solution is presented also for aL  , which now defines a stable propagation approaching the limiting solution (dash-dot line) of two separated layers free to slide along each other (see also [7]).…”
Section: Macro-structural Response -Critical Load Vs Load Deflection mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial traction laws in Eqs. (2) and (3) assume no coupling between in-plane and outof-plane interface tractions, namely K k 13 ¼ K k 23 ¼ 0 and K k 33 ¼ K k N , as it is normally assumed in the literature on cohesive cracks [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3), using Eqs. (7) and (8). After lengthy algebraic manipulations, as suggested in [17], the resulting displacement jumps are defined in terms of the global displacement variables:…”
Section: Two Length-scales Displacement Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation