2012
DOI: 10.1070/sm2012v203n06abeh004245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On additive shifts of multiplicative subgroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the special case of A being a multiplicative subgroup of F * p , the same bound was proved by Heath-Brown and Konyagin [17] and improved by V'jugin and Shkredov [40] (for suitably small multiplicative subgroups) to Ω . Theorem 3 becomes a vehicle to extend bounds for multiplicative subgroups to approximate subgroups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the special case of A being a multiplicative subgroup of F * p , the same bound was proved by Heath-Brown and Konyagin [17] and improved by V'jugin and Shkredov [40] (for suitably small multiplicative subgroups) to Ω . Theorem 3 becomes a vehicle to extend bounds for multiplicative subgroups to approximate subgroups.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…We start with a recent result of Shkredov & Vyugin [209]: [167] have given a series of bounds on #(G ± G), see also [173]. Many of this results are based on upper bounds for additive energy, that is 1 + a 2 = a 3 + a 4 : a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a 4 ∈ G of G. Heath-Brown & Konyagin [120] have proved that for #G p 2/3 , we have…”
Section: Structured Setsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Applying Proposition 14 with t 1 = t 2 , S(y) = y, T (y) = ay+b cy+d yields Corollary 15. For p large prime, t|(p − 1), t ≤ p 3 4 and U t = {y ∈ F p : y t = 1} the t-th roots of 1, Proof of Proposition 14: First we need a generalization of Proposition 3.2 in [VS12] where their common t is replaced by t 0 , t 1 , . .…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%