2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2010.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On adjunctions between Lim, SL-Top, and SL-Lim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14]. [20] (or, a stratified L-ordered convergence structure in the terminology of [2]) on a set X is a function lim :…”
Section: Pretopological Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[11][12][13][14]. [20] (or, a stratified L-ordered convergence structure in the terminology of [2]) on a set X is a function lim :…”
Section: Pretopological Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following example shows that this is not true for stratified L-generalized convergence spaces in general. [2], Jäger [13], Li and Jin [20]). Let L be the linearly ordered frame ({0, , 1}, ∧, 1) with 0 < < 1.…”
Section: Proof (Lp) ⇒ (Lq) For Each Non-void L-subsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Later, Yao [33] generalized lattice-valued convergence spaces to the lattice context of complete residuated lattices. A similar lattice background is also used in [23,24], however, the definitions of a lattice-valued filter in these two papers do not coincide. Looking at the definition of a stratified lattice-valued filter in [13], it becomes clear that both papers actually use different enriched cl-premonoids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%