2016
DOI: 10.1002/int.21813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Algebraic Structure of L-Fuzzy Bags

Abstract: This study introduces a revised definition for fuzzy bags. It is based on the definition of bags given by Delgado et al. (Int J Intell Syst 2009;24:706–721) in which each bag has two parts: function and summary information. The new definition is given as a special case of L‐fuzzy bags, where L is a complete lattice. By some examples, the new concept is illustrated. Furthermore, the algebraic structure of L‐fuzzy bags is studied and the concept of α‐cuts, L‐fuzzy bag relations, and related theorems are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next section, we review the concept of fuzzy bags and quote some results about them. For more details see [7] and [8].…”
Section: Example 1 ( [2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the next section, we review the concept of fuzzy bags and quote some results about them. For more details see [7] and [8].…”
Section: Example 1 ( [2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is shown in [5], the lattice of all fuzzy bags defined by D e l g a d o et al [2] is a complete Boolean algebra which is not compatible with the nature of fuzziness. Improving this incompatibility, in the present paper, we quote a revised definition of fuzzy bags as a special case of L-fuzzy bags based on the proposed definition of bags in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, they proposed new definitions for bags and fuzzy bags. As it is shown in [3], the lattice of all fuzzy bags defined by Delgado et al [2] is a complete Boolean algebra which is not compatible with the nature of fuzziness. Improving this incompatibility, in [4], we quoted a revised definition for fuzzy bags based on the proposed definition of bags in [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%