2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.14250
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On an Average Goldbach Representation Formula of Fujii

Abstract: Fujii obtained a formula for the average number of Goldbach representations with lower order terms expressed as a sum over the zeros of the Riemann zeta-function and a smaller error term. This assumed the Riemann Hypothesis. We obtain an unconditional version of this result, and obtain applications conditional on various conjectures on zeros of the Riemann zeta-function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second equation actually depends on RH, which is included from our assumption on L(s, χ 0 ). The method we use is a combination of the methods of the papers [GS23] and [FGIS22]. We can use this method to prove (5) but the proof is much more complicated than the proof of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second equation actually depends on RH, which is included from our assumption on L(s, χ 0 ). The method we use is a combination of the methods of the papers [GS23] and [FGIS22]. We can use this method to prove (5) but the proof is much more complicated than the proof of Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently we obtained a quantitative improvement in the bound for R(x) as an application of a method related to a formula of Fujii [GS21]. The main result we obtained is that, assuming RH and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1]. Other interval results for Goldbach numbers include those under certain assumptions, such as in Corollary 3 of [8] for intervals (x, x + C log x), and estimates on the average number of Goldbach numbers in intervals [9]. We prove the following explicit version of Montgomery and Vaughan's result in Section 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%