2001
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-01-10716-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On an exact mass formula of Shimura

Abstract: In a series of recent papers, G. Shimura obtained an exact formula for the mass of a maximal lattice in a quadratic or hermitian space over a totally real number field. Using Bruhat-Tits theory, we obtain a quick and more conceptual proof of his formula when the form is totally definite.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now by [6] the mass of G ai (Q, n) does not depend on i, (as locally the lattices are just rescaled versions of each other) so for all i Mass(G ai (Q, n)) = Mass(M) 2 h −2 K 2 −1−s and the theorem follows from the computation of Mass(M) in Theorem 5.1.…”
Section: The Minkowski-siegel Mass Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now by [6] the mass of G ai (Q, n) does not depend on i, (as locally the lattices are just rescaled versions of each other) so for all i Mass(G ai (Q, n)) = Mass(M) 2 h −2 K 2 −1−s and the theorem follows from the computation of Mass(M) in Theorem 5.1.…”
Section: The Minkowski-siegel Mass Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of the cardinality of GU A0 (Z (p) )\GU(A p,∞ )/K is a class number question for the group GU. Unfortunately, preliminary calculations of this cardinality by the first author, using the mass formulas of [8], seem to indicate that, even in the case of p = 5 and n = 4, this class number is quite large.…”
Section: Connective Covers Of Eo Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a natural class of lattices L in (V , q), an explicit formula for Mass(L) was given in [GHY,Proposition 2.13], based on the fundamental work [P] and its extension [Gr]. These are the lattices for which the local stabilizers K L v are parahoric subgroups of G(F v ).…”
Section: A Mass Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the derivation given in [GHY,§2] only relies on [GG,Proposition 9.3], and the latter holds without these restrictions, as long as the group G is semisimple.…”
Section: A Mass Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation