2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2168415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On analysis of exponentially decaying pulse signals using stochastic volatility model

Abstract: A stochastic volatility model incorporating the exponential power distributions is adopted in the present study to analyze exponentially decaying pulses in the presence of background noises of various magnitudes. The discussions are focused on its effectiveness in the determination of the instant of the pulse initiation and the decay constant. The results are compared with those obtained by the conventional short-time Fourier transform. It is found that the present stochastic volatility model can retrieve the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present u is basically the same as those obtained using the EP distribution with a kurtosis of 0.75. 3 The variation pattern of h is also very close to that shown in Chan et al 3 Further increas- ing ␣ may result in a slightly better performance, but the very computer resources demanding calculation makes it impractical.…”
Section: Numerical Examplessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The present u is basically the same as those obtained using the EP distribution with a kurtosis of 0.75. 3 The variation pattern of h is also very close to that shown in Chan et al 3 Further increas- ing ␣ may result in a slightly better performance, but the very computer resources demanding calculation makes it impractical.…”
Section: Numerical Examplessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, the pulse initiation and its eventual decay are still observable with the EP distribution at this signal-to-noise ratio level. 3 Results for ␣ Ͻ 30 are not presented as they are all worse than those shown in Figs. 1 and 2.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations