2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-011-9258-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients

Abstract: Recent studies suggest a diagnostic value of the photopic negative response (PhNR) with a long-duration stimulus. The aim of this study was to record the on and off responses of the photopic fullfield electroretinogram (ERG) in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. We focused on different waves of the responses after onset and offset of the long-duration stimulus ERG. Photopic fullfield ERGs were recorded in response to a white bright LED flash on a white 20 cd/m(2) background. Stimulus luminances were 40, 60… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
32
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
32
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[45][46][47] The broadening of the d-wave peak in the focal ERG and the presence of the 3PP in the full-field long ERG in participants with ADOA may be due to contributions from the cone receptor potential and/or depolarizing OFF-bipolar cell responses after light offset, which were unmasked in the relative absence of the negative going PhNR OFF . [48][49][50] The 2PP may be the i OFF -wave described by Horn et al, 51 although in contrast to their results, this study did not record a significant difference in amplitude between controls and participants with ADOA.…”
Section: Comparison Of Focal and Full-field Phnrscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…[45][46][47] The broadening of the d-wave peak in the focal ERG and the presence of the 3PP in the full-field long ERG in participants with ADOA may be due to contributions from the cone receptor potential and/or depolarizing OFF-bipolar cell responses after light offset, which were unmasked in the relative absence of the negative going PhNR OFF . [48][49][50] The 2PP may be the i OFF -wave described by Horn et al, 51 although in contrast to their results, this study did not record a significant difference in amplitude between controls and participants with ADOA.…”
Section: Comparison Of Focal and Full-field Phnrscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…There are less (and somewhat inconsistent) studies so far examining PhNR in ocular hypertension: North et al 29 and Viswanathan et al 18 found reduced PhNR amplitudes in patients with OHT. Colotto et al 50 and Horn et al 51 in Above the spectra, the response frequency in Hz with P value and amplitude in lV are given. P values were calculated based on the signal-to-noise-ratio.…”
Section: Comparison Of Phnr and Perg In Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different stimulus conditions might be one reason for these discrepancies: North 29 and Viswanathan 18 used short flashes (5 ms), Horn 51 and Colotto 50 used long flashes (200 ms). A second reason might be small sample sizes.…”
Section: Comparison Of Phnr and Perg In Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be advantageous to study the on-and off-responses separately. To separate these responses, long-duration flashes have been used [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Owing to the flash duration in the long-flash ERG, fast adaptation mechanisms may cause some adaptation to the different light levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clinical studies, the PhNR of the flash ERG has been reported to be an indicator of glaucomatous damage of the retinal ganglion cells [5,16,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%