“…Proof. If ∇ g satisfies (∇ g X J)Y − (∇ g Y J)X = 0, for all vector fields X, Y on M , then, taking into account (10), one concludes that the torsion tensor T 0 vanishes, and therefore, (M, J, g) is Kähler type manifold (see Theorem 3.1).…”
Section: Characterizations Of Kähler Type and Integrable Manifolds By...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the case α = ε = −1, manifolds satisfying the Codazzi equation are called anti-Kähler-Codazzi manifolds, while in the case α = ε = 1, this kind of manifolds are called para-Kähler-Norden-Codazzi manifolds. First, in the Norden case, they were introduced in [12] and have been intensively studied (see also [10,11]). Afterward, the class of manifolds characterized by the Codazzi equation were extended without changes in [8] to the other αε = 1 case, the product Riemannian case.…”
Nearly Kähler and Kähler-Codazzi type manifolds are defined in a very similar way. We prove that nearly Kähler type manifolds have sense just in Hermitian and para-Hermitian contexts, and that Kähler-Codazzi type manifolds reduce to Kähler type manifolds in all the four Hermitian, para-Hermitian, Norden and product Riemannian geometries.
“…Proof. If ∇ g satisfies (∇ g X J)Y − (∇ g Y J)X = 0, for all vector fields X, Y on M , then, taking into account (10), one concludes that the torsion tensor T 0 vanishes, and therefore, (M, J, g) is Kähler type manifold (see Theorem 3.1).…”
Section: Characterizations Of Kähler Type and Integrable Manifolds By...mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the case α = ε = −1, manifolds satisfying the Codazzi equation are called anti-Kähler-Codazzi manifolds, while in the case α = ε = 1, this kind of manifolds are called para-Kähler-Norden-Codazzi manifolds. First, in the Norden case, they were introduced in [12] and have been intensively studied (see also [10,11]). Afterward, the class of manifolds characterized by the Codazzi equation were extended without changes in [8] to the other αε = 1 case, the product Riemannian case.…”
Nearly Kähler and Kähler-Codazzi type manifolds are defined in a very similar way. We prove that nearly Kähler type manifolds have sense just in Hermitian and para-Hermitian contexts, and that Kähler-Codazzi type manifolds reduce to Kähler type manifolds in all the four Hermitian, para-Hermitian, Norden and product Riemannian geometries.
“…In this section, by employing the method proposed in [4] for anti-Hermitian manifolds we search for linear connections with torsion on an almost metallic Hermitian manifold (M 2k , g, J M ). We will be calling these connections linear connections of the first type and of the second type, respectively.…”
Section: Linear Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the method from [4], we have the following definition. i.e., the linear connection of the first type is given by ∇ = ∇ + 1 3q J M (∇J M ).…”
In this paper, we construct metallic Kähler and nearly metallic Kähler structures on Riemanian manifolds. For such manifolds with these structures, we study curvature properties. Also we describe linear connections on the manifold, which preserve the associated fundamental 2-form and satisfy some additional conditions and present some results concerning them.2010 Mathematics subject classifications: Primary 53C55; Secondary 53C05.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.