2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On area and entropy of a black hole

Abstract: We consider a model of a black hole consisting of a number of elementary components. Examples of such models occur in the Ashtekar's approach to canonical Quantum Gravity and in M-theory. We show that treating the elementary components as completely distinguishable leads to the area law for the black hole entropy. Contrary to previous results, we show that no Bose condensation occurs, the area has big local fluctuations and that in the framework of canonical Quantum Gravity the area of the black hole horizon i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

11
131
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
11
131
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] and our analysis for a two dimensional non-commutative space agrees with this spectra. On the other hand, the horizon area of black holes has been a relevant geometrical object.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[5] and our analysis for a two dimensional non-commutative space agrees with this spectra. On the other hand, the horizon area of black holes has been a relevant geometrical object.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is remarkable that using the simple hypothesis of no commutativity in two spatial dimension we can get a spectrum very similar to the obtained by the proposal of loop quantum gravity given in [5] and also that this spectrum is similar to the obtained for a black hole. This could be suggest that the proposal given in [5] is the correct and that exist a very profound relationship between quantum gravity and non-commutative geometry.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[13] is not correct. Notice that the physical state does not change by adding or removing closed loops with j = 0.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this case, the Immirzi parameter is modified as γ = ln 3/(2π √ 2). This consideration calls various arguments such as modification of the gauge group SU(2) to SO(3) or the modification of the area spectrum in LQG and so on which we will discuss later [13,14,15,16,17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%