“…j (x j − α)and we write Z m,α for the cycle in J obtained by the image of f m,α . In[24, Theorem 1.1] we computed h ′ L (Z m,α ) and we may deduce from this resulth ′ L (Z m,α ) ≥ g−r 2dK g−1) 2 − (2g+1) r j<k mj m k 6g(g−1) 2 (g−2) ω2 X + r j<k mj m k 3g(g−1)(g−2) ϕ(X) ,(8.4)where for r = 1 the fractions with factor r j<k m j m k = 0 in the nominator are also set to be 0 if g = 2. This inequality allows us to prove Corollary 1.5.Proof of Corollary 1.5.…”