2020
DOI: 10.1002/qre.2701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On autoregressive model selection for the exponentially weighted moving average control chart of residuals in monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes

Abstract: With the development of automation technologies, data can be collected in a high frequency, easily causing autocorrelation phenomena. Control charts of residuals have been used as a good way to monitor autocorrelated processes. The residuals have been often computed based on autoregressive (AR) models whose building needs much experience. Data have been assumed to be firstorder autocorrelated, and first-order autoregressive (AR(1)) models have been employed to obtain residuals. But for a pth-order autocorrelat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When there is autocorrelation effect in Phase II, the LMM approach, as well as the proposed statistics by Noorossana, Amiri and Soleimani [45], Soleimani, Noorossana and Amiri [46] and Ahmadi, Yeganeh and Shadman [47] can be utilized to remove the autocorrelation effect; note that this is similar to the Phase I analysis for the T 2 control chart. On the other hand, several researchers, such as Sheu and Lu [53] and Li, et al [54], studied the robustness of EWMA control charts with the effect of autocorrelation in the Phase II analysis so that the MEWMA approach [42] can be directly employed with autocorrelated data. More discussions on the latter are presented in Appendix A.…”
Section: Phase II Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is autocorrelation effect in Phase II, the LMM approach, as well as the proposed statistics by Noorossana, Amiri and Soleimani [45], Soleimani, Noorossana and Amiri [46] and Ahmadi, Yeganeh and Shadman [47] can be utilized to remove the autocorrelation effect; note that this is similar to the Phase I analysis for the T 2 control chart. On the other hand, several researchers, such as Sheu and Lu [53] and Li, et al [54], studied the robustness of EWMA control charts with the effect of autocorrelation in the Phase II analysis so that the MEWMA approach [42] can be directly employed with autocorrelated data. More discussions on the latter are presented in Appendix A.…”
Section: Phase II Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the values of the weight λ = 0 . 05 , 0 . 1 , 0 . 2 are typical choices in detecting small shifts in processes. 4547 Also, λ = 0 . 4 has been recommended to ensure the weights match those given by a Shewhart control chart with the Western Electric rules. 48 Moreover, when λ = 1 , the EWMA control chart is actually a Shewhart one.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Yu [20] proposed a deep learning approach for monitoring autocorrelated observations. Li et al [21] used the EWMA control chart to monitor the residual of the p-th order autoregressive model. Keshavarz et al [22] modified the accelerated failure time regression model to account for the autocorrelated data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%