2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On balanced k -coverage in visual sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is only partly similar because cameras can be oriented, they can pan and zoom, and deployments are in the order of tens of cameras, while we have tens of thousands of potential locations. However, given the similarity to network coverage, we adapt the heuristic proposed in [20] that tries to achieve a fair coverage of selected targets from multiple cameras.…”
Section: Sensors and Camera Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is only partly similar because cameras can be oriented, they can pan and zoom, and deployments are in the order of tens of cameras, while we have tens of thousands of potential locations. However, given the similarity to network coverage, we adapt the heuristic proposed in [20] that tries to achieve a fair coverage of selected targets from multiple cameras.…”
Section: Sensors and Camera Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [27], the authors introduced the balanced k-coverage problem. The problem aims to avoid the situations in which k-coverage is provided merely for some targets in the network, while the rest are left uncovered or covered individually.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weakness of this algorithm is that when the densities of the nodes are low, a coverage hole could exist. The authors in [9] addressed the problem of covering each target at least k times while using a minimum number of sensors. They devised a greedy approach with two variants of incentive mechanisms to solve this problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) and Eq. (9). We use the relationship between the random value in [0, 1] and the parameter Pr as in Eq.…”
Section: C: the Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%