Proceedings of INFOCOM'95
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.1995.515978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On bandwidth and storage tradeoffs in multimedia distribution networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We differ by studying the ongoing running cost of a video system. Schaffa and Nussbaumer study a distributed video system in which servers are configured as a hierarchical balanced tree, and all video files are replicated at a certain level in the tree [8]. While the paper studies the symmetric case in which request rates across the servers at a given tree level are the same, we make no such assumption here.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We differ by studying the ongoing running cost of a video system. Schaffa and Nussbaumer study a distributed video system in which servers are configured as a hierarchical balanced tree, and all video files are replicated at a certain level in the tree [8]. While the paper studies the symmetric case in which request rates across the servers at a given tree level are the same, we make no such assumption here.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the average storage used is (7) Regarding , if there is no request arriving within the multicast interval, the multicast stream would be aborted after minutes; otherwise it would be used for a time minutes. Therefore (8) Note that , which is one stream more than the true-VOD case. This is expected because when , streams are "started and aborted" continuously and such wastage amounts to one full stream.…”
Section: B Multicast Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simpler approaches consider only the aggregate user demand; the specific objects requested are not important [3,4,15]. Another avenue is to treat objects individually, associating with each a different popularity (user demand) [5,12]. Although most of these functions account for transport costs and some for storage costs, none of them explicitly includes the number and cost of the equipment installed at each location.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to store only specific objects from the origin at the surrogate servers [12]. The empirical study performed in [7] indicates that approximately 80% of requests for Web objects are for 10% of the objects.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation