2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2001.tb00274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Bank Instability: A Final Reply to Neal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My interpretation of his view is that both these factors mean that Australian banks do not have fragile balance sheets. If the former is true, monopoly control of the note issue should not have been an issue as in Coombes (1999). If the latter is true (and I don't believe it to be so), there is no need for the prudential regulations imposed by APRA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My interpretation of his view is that both these factors mean that Australian banks do not have fragile balance sheets. If the former is true, monopoly control of the note issue should not have been an issue as in Coombes (1999). If the latter is true (and I don't believe it to be so), there is no need for the prudential regulations imposed by APRA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%