2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.13117
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Benford's Law for multiplicative functions

Abstract: We provide a criterion to determine whether a real multiplicative function is a strong Benford sequence. The criterion implies that the k-divisor functions, where k = 10 j , and Hecke eigenvalues of newforms, such as Ramanujan tau function, are strong Benford. Moreover, we deduce from the criterion that the collection of multiplicative functions which are not strong Benford forms a group under pointwise multiplication. In contrast to earlier work, our approach is based on Halász's Theorem.From now on, we will … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is shown there that ϕ(n) is not Benford, but that |τ(n)| is, where τ is Ramanujan's τ-function. 1 All of the work in [8] is carried out in base 10, but both of the quoted results hold, by simple modifications of the proofs, in each fixed base b ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it is shown there that ϕ(n) is not Benford, but that |τ(n)| is, where τ is Ramanujan's τ-function. 1 All of the work in [8] is carried out in base 10, but both of the quoted results hold, by simple modifications of the proofs, in each fixed base b ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion was noted by Aursukaree and Chandee [3] and used by them to show that the divisor function d(n) is Benford in base 10. A more systematic study of the Benford behavior of multiplicative functions, leveraging Halász's celebrated mean value theorem, was recently undertaken in [8]. For example, it is shown there that ϕ(n) is not Benford, but that |τ(n)| is, where τ is Ramanujan's τ-function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%