2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00041-010-9134-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Besov Regularity of Temperatures

Abstract: We prove space-time parabolic Besov regularity in terms of integrability of Besov norms in the space variable for solutions of the heat equation on cylindrical regions based on Lipschitz domains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restriction m ≥ 2 in Theorem 7 comes from the fact that we require s 2 = m > d 2 = 3 2 in (4.23). This assumption can probably be weakened, since we expect the solution to satisfy u ∈ L 2 ([0, T ], H s (D)) for all s < 3 2 , see also Remark 11 and the explanations given there.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The restriction m ≥ 2 in Theorem 7 comes from the fact that we require s 2 = m > d 2 = 3 2 in (4.23). This assumption can probably be weakened, since we expect the solution to satisfy u ∈ L 2 ([0, T ], H s (D)) for all s < 3 2 , see also Remark 11 and the explanations given there.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, not so many results in this direction are available so far. For parabolic equations, first results for the special case of the heat equation have been reported in [2][3][4], but for a slightly different scale of Besov spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our first result, we shall use the parabolic analog of Theorem 3.1 in [8], essentially contained in Corollary 5.2 of [2]. Our second result is a corollary of the first one if we use Theorem 1.1 in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For the proof of Theorem 2, we shall make use of the next result which is contained in Theorem 1.1 in [3] and remarks following it.…”
Section: Gradient Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The restriction m ≥ 2 in Theorem 4.10 comes from the fact that we require m > d p = 3 2 in (4.26). This assumption can probably be weakened, since we expect the solution to satisfy u ∈ L 2 ((0, T ), W s 2 (K)) for all s < 3 2 , see also Remark 4.7 and the explanations given there. Moreover, the restriction a ≥ − 1 2 in Theorem 4.10 comes from Corollary 2.5 that we applied.…”
Section: Remark 411mentioning
confidence: 99%