2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10496-001-0035-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On best simultaneous approximation in quotient spaces

Abstract: We assume that X is a normed linear space, W and M are subspaces of X. We develop a theory of best simultaneous approximation in quotient spaces and introduce equivalent assertions between the subspaces W and W + M and the quotient space W /M.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results proved in this section are motivated by the corresponding results proved for proximinality in [3], simultaneous proximinality in [8,11], and strong proximinality in [13].…”
Section: Sum and Quotient Of Simultaneously Strongly Proximinal Subspmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results proved in this section are motivated by the corresponding results proved for proximinality in [3], simultaneous proximinality in [8,11], and strong proximinality in [13].…”
Section: Sum and Quotient Of Simultaneously Strongly Proximinal Subspmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this section, we discuss simultaneous strong proximinality for the sum and quotient subspaces of X and see how simultaneous strong proximinaliy is transmitted to and from quotient spaces and to sum of subspaces. The results proved in this section are motivated by the corresponding results proved for proximinality in [3], simultaneous proximinality in [8,11], and strong proximinality in [13].…”
Section: Sum and Quotient Of Simultaneously Strongly Proximinal Subspacesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Throughout this paper, we suppose that S is either a bounded or a finite set. Also, we shall use the following Lemma in the sequel which has been proved in [1] and [5]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%