2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icip42928.2021.9506429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Block Prediction For Learning-Based Point Cloud Compression

Abstract: Point clouds are among popular visual representations for immersive media. However, the vast amount of information generated during their acquisition requires effective compression for practical applications. Although relevant activities from standardization bodies have led to state-of-the-art compression using conventional methods, learning-based encoders have recently emerged as promising solutions with comparable performance while offering additional attractive features. Yet, there is still a large unexplor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach would constitute an end-to-end optimized alternative architecture for scalable coding. We can additionally propose the integration of our module with an intra or inter prediction algorithm, 47 used to encode the residuals between a prediction and a reference point cloud. Finally, future research could also concentrate on adapting this proposed architecture for compression of point cloud attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach would constitute an end-to-end optimized alternative architecture for scalable coding. We can additionally propose the integration of our module with an intra or inter prediction algorithm, 47 used to encode the residuals between a prediction and a reference point cloud. Finally, future research could also concentrate on adapting this proposed architecture for compression of point cloud attributes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing inspiration from the remarkable achievements of learning-based methods in image and video compression, similar architectures have been adopted for PCGC. For static PCGC, early works employed dense 3D convolutions in autoencoder architectures for lossy PCGC [2,3,4] and block prediction [5]. Alternatively, voxel occupancy values were directly estimated [6] for lossless coding approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like previous works (Zhang et al, 2014;Cohen et al, 2016;de Queiroz and Chou, 2016;Thanou et al, 2016;de Queiroz and Chou, 2017;Pavez et al, 2018;Chou et al, 2020;Krivokuća et al, 2020), both V-PCC and G-PCC compress geometry first, then compress attributes conditioned on geometry. Neural networks have been applied with some success to geometry compression (Yan et al, 2019;Quach et al, 2019;Guarda et al, 2019a,b;Guarda et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2020;Quach et al, 2020a;Milani, 2020Milani, , 2021Lazzarotto et al, 2021), but not to lossy attribute compression. Exceptions may include (Quach et al, 2020b), which uses learned neural 3D → 2D folding but compresses with conventional image coding, and Deep-PCAC (Sheng et al, 2021), which compresses attributes using a PointNet-style architecture, which is not volumetric and underperforms our framework by 2-5 dB (see Figure 12B and Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Point Cloud Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%