2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.12.256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Blocks, Tempering and Particle MCMC for Systems Identification

Abstract: The widespread use of particle methods for addressing the filtering and smoothing problems in state-space models has, in recent years, been complemented by the development of particle Markov Chain Monte Carlo (PMCMC) methods. PMCMC uses particle filters within offline systems-identification settings. We develop a modified particle filter, based around block sampling and tempering, intended to improve their exploration of the state space and the associated estimation of the marginal likelihood. The aim is to de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The localisation approach to overcoming weight degeneracy when applying pfs to spatial models considered here could also be combined with other methods for improving pf performance in high-dimensional ssms. In particular tempering approaches split the usual single prediction and assimilation update per observation time into multiple updates which target a sequence of distributions bridging between the filtering distributions at adjacent observation times (Frei and Künsch, 2013;Johansen, 2015;Beskos et al, 2017;Svensson, Schön and Lindsten, 2018;Herbst and Schorfheide, 2019). Tempering could be paired with our framework to further improve its robustness to high-dimensional and strongly informative observations, with the use of multiple assimilation updates per observation time when tempering making the reduced computational cost and improved smoothness preservation of our approach particularly important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The localisation approach to overcoming weight degeneracy when applying pfs to spatial models considered here could also be combined with other methods for improving pf performance in high-dimensional ssms. In particular tempering approaches split the usual single prediction and assimilation update per observation time into multiple updates which target a sequence of distributions bridging between the filtering distributions at adjacent observation times (Frei and Künsch, 2013;Johansen, 2015;Beskos et al, 2017;Svensson, Schön and Lindsten, 2018;Herbst and Schorfheide, 2019). Tempering could be paired with our framework to further improve its robustness to high-dimensional and strongly informative observations, with the use of multiple assimilation updates per observation time when tempering making the reduced computational cost and improved smoothness preservation of our approach particularly important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover for PFs, the ideal proposal distribution from which prior weights are sampled, must be different from the posterior to allow effective estimation (Godsill & Clapp, 2001). However, if this difference is too large then the importance weights will be close to zero for frequent outcomes and close to one for rare values (Johansen, 2015). Consequently, the state estimates obtained will be dominated by a small subset of the Markov chain (Woodhead, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"bootstrap proposal" and could be mitigated in the same way as standard particle filters by seeking to design (marginal) proposal distributions which incorporate the influence of observations. In addition, this phenomenon can be mitigated with the use of (adaptive) tempering, as shown in, e.g., Jasra et al (2010); Johansen (2015); Wang et al (2020); Zhou et al (2016) for standard SMC and Lindsten et al (2017, Section 4.2) for DaC-SMC.…”
Section: Adaptive Lightweight Mixture Resamplingmentioning
confidence: 99%