2016
DOI: 10.3390/info7020021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Body Smartphone Localization with an Accelerometer

Abstract: A user of a smartphone may feel convenient, happy, safe, etc., if his/her smartphone works smartly based on his/her context or the context of the device. In this article, we deal with the position of a smartphone on the body and carrying items like bags as the context of a device. The storing position of a smartphone impacts the performance of the notification to a user, as well as the measurement of embedded sensors, which plays an important role in a device's functionality control, accurate activity recognit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incel [14] shows an extensive study on acceleration-based phone localization, in which recognition features are proposed that represent the movement, rotation and orientation of devices during diverse activities of a person such as walking, sitting and biking. Fujinami proposed 63 classifier-independent features for 9 on-body phone positions including bags during walking, which selected based on as what are more predictive of classes and less correlated with each other [7]. Shi et al [25], Alanezi et al [1], and Incel [14] utilized a gyroscope in combination with an accelerometer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Incel [14] shows an extensive study on acceleration-based phone localization, in which recognition features are proposed that represent the movement, rotation and orientation of devices during diverse activities of a person such as walking, sitting and biking. Fujinami proposed 63 classifier-independent features for 9 on-body phone positions including bags during walking, which selected based on as what are more predictive of classes and less correlated with each other [7]. Shi et al [25], Alanezi et al [1], and Incel [14] utilized a gyroscope in combination with an accelerometer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross validation is carried out by testing a dataset from a particular person with a classifier that is trained without a dataset from the person. So, LOSO-CV is regarded as a fairer and practical test method, and recently getting attention [1], [7], [14], [30]. To validate the generalization of a classification model, the number of subjects is important, i.e., small number of subjects fail in capturing the characteristic of the population.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations