On bounding the Stückrad-Vogel multiplicity

O’Carroll, Liam

doi:10.1017/s001309150000715x

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(23 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore Lemma 1 and 2 provide Corollary 5.2. L. O'Carroll's idea in [12] of bounding the intersection multiplicity j(X, F; C) is indeed a key assumption in some of our above results. We therefore want to investigate such bounds.…”

Section: =^ (Iii) Follows From Theorem 1 (Iv) =^ (Ii) : Our Lemma 4mentioning

confidence: 82%

On Multiplicities of Non-isolated Intersection Components

Vogel¹

1991

Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: =^ (Iii) Follows From Theorem 1 (Iv) =^ (Ii) : Our Lemma 4mentioning

confidence: 82%

On Multiplicities of Non-isolated Intersection Components

Vogel¹

1991

Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This allows us to pass from the intersection of reduced schemes to that of general pure dimensional schemes. The main result of H. Flenner and W. Vogel in [1] and the result of L. O'Carroll in [8] treat the reduced case. Theorem 2.9 especially has some interesting applications.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Notes on questions of W. Vogel concerning the converse to Bézout's theorem

Pruschke

1993

Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lazarsfeld proved a bound for the excess dimension of an intersection of irreducible and reduced schemes. Flenner and Vogel gave another approach for reduced, non-degenerate schemes which are connected in codimension one, using the intersection algorithm of Stiickrad and Vogel and defining a new multiplicity k. Renschuch and Vogel considered a condition to ensure that there is no degeneration for more than two schemes. We define an integer which enables us to unify these methods. This allows us to generalize the result of Flenner and Vogel to non-reduced schemes by comparing the multiplicities j and k. Using this point of view we give applications to converses of Bezout's theorem; in particular we investigate the Cohen-Macaulay case.1991 Mathematics subject classification: Primary 14C17. Secondary 13H15.H. Flenner and W. Vogel gave a first approach to the converse to Bezout's theorem in [1]. Since then there has been other work on this subject (see [2,9,13, 14]). The converse to Bezout's theorem consists of an answer to the following question: under which conditions does the situation of a proper intersection follow from a Bezout'sequality? In this connection, in [13, 14] a relation between the excess dimension and dimensions of vector spaces of linear forms is considered. We want to investigate this connection rather more deeply.We always consider the intersection of two or more than two schemes. This transition from the case of two schemes is not quite trivial, as the discussion of example 12.3.5 of [3, p. 225] in [9, p. 316, Remark 1] shows. In [3, p. 225], one assumption is missed and this is corrected by an unnecessarily strong condition. This condition is commented on and also weakened in [4]. We give here a new condition.In particular, in Proposition 2.4 and Theorem 2.9., we give generalizations of Theorem 4.2 of [1]. These generalizations are based on Proposition 2.2 and Lemma 2.8. In the latter we compare the intersection multiplicities j (see [3,11,12]) and k (see [1], where the notation J was used). This allows us to pass from the intersection of reduced schemes to that of general pure dimensional schemes. The main result of H. Flenner and W. Vogel in [1] and the result of L. O'Carroll in [8] treat the reduced case. Theorem 2.9 especially has some interesting applications. For example, we use this result in Section 3 to give a new proof of Proposition 3.12 of [2] and to study the CohenMacaulay case. Also, we give in Corollary 3.3 a partial answer to the question following Theorem 7 in [14]. We generalize the Theorem of [13] in the geometrically more 427

show abstract

On bounding the Stückrad-Vogel multiplicity

Cited by 2 publications

References 17 publications

On Multiplicities of Non-isolated Intersection Components

On Multiplicities of Non-isolated Intersection Components

Notes on questions of W. Vogel concerning the converse to Bézout's theorem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About