2022
DOI: 10.1002/rsa.21076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On breadth‐first constructions of scaling limits of random graphs and random unicellular maps

Abstract: We give alternate constructions of (i) the scaling limit of the uniform connected graphs with given fixed surplus, and (ii) the continuum random unicellular map of a given genus that start with a suitably tilted Brownian continuum random tree and make “horizontal” point identifications, at random heights, using the local time measures. Consequently, this can be seen as a continuum analogue of the breadth‐first construction of a finite connected graph. In particular, this yields a breadth‐first construction of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of Corollary 1.10, the difficulty is two-fold: First, the critical components have surplus edges. For the scaling limits of critical Erdős-Rényi random graphs, Miermont and Sen [29] recently gave a breadth-first construction, which yields an alternative description of the scaling limit of the radius function from a fixed point (rescaled by n 1/3 ). However, the description for the diameter and an explicit formula such as the one by Wang [33] is still an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of Corollary 1.10, the difficulty is two-fold: First, the critical components have surplus edges. For the scaling limits of critical Erdős-Rényi random graphs, Miermont and Sen [29] recently gave a breadth-first construction, which yields an alternative description of the scaling limit of the radius function from a fixed point (rescaled by n 1/3 ). However, the description for the diameter and an explicit formula such as the one by Wang [33] is still an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%