Between Democracy and Law 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429032400-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Brexit and secession(s)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having argued that Brexit is not a form of secession within the traditional vocabulary of international law or, even, the framework of decisional secession from federal states, there remains some scope for some observations on the secessionist rationale of Brexit. Indeed, while one might question the amenability of Brexit to the terminology of secession properly‐so‐called, it cannot be overlooked that ‘the issues arising from Brexit are reminiscent of those arising out of state succession’ (Vidmar, 2018, p. 444) and that Brexit ‘bears some similarity with secessionist constitutional processes around the globe’ (Skoutaris, 2019, p. 210). This is true both in terms of the domestic regulatory apparatus that followed the referendum through the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, which aims to ensure legal continuity in a manner that is characteristic of secession (Douglas‐Scott, 2016), as well as in aspects of the political discourse that gave ammunition to Brexit.…”
Section: Finding Counter‐majoritarian Inspiration In Decisional Seces...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having argued that Brexit is not a form of secession within the traditional vocabulary of international law or, even, the framework of decisional secession from federal states, there remains some scope for some observations on the secessionist rationale of Brexit. Indeed, while one might question the amenability of Brexit to the terminology of secession properly‐so‐called, it cannot be overlooked that ‘the issues arising from Brexit are reminiscent of those arising out of state succession’ (Vidmar, 2018, p. 444) and that Brexit ‘bears some similarity with secessionist constitutional processes around the globe’ (Skoutaris, 2019, p. 210). This is true both in terms of the domestic regulatory apparatus that followed the referendum through the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, which aims to ensure legal continuity in a manner that is characteristic of secession (Douglas‐Scott, 2016), as well as in aspects of the political discourse that gave ammunition to Brexit.…”
Section: Finding Counter‐majoritarian Inspiration In Decisional Seces...mentioning
confidence: 99%