2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On calculating reorganization energies for electrochemical reactions using density functional theory and continuum solvation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average change in the Cu−O bond length is 0.074 Å, and the average change in the Mayer bond order between 2 and 2+ is 0.09 (Table S1); thus, these differences in covalency and coupling result from the nature of the bridge in 2 versus 2+ being O 2− vs O •− , respectively, rather than structural differences. To emphasize the point, the Marcus reorganization energy (λ inner ) 81 of the 2 → 2 + oxidation (Table S2) was calculated (see Supporting Information) 82 and found to be 0.143 eV. This small value is on the order of the experimentally measured Fc → Fc + λ inner of ∼0.1 eV 83,84 and much smaller than the already small λ inner reported by Karlin and co-workers for [Cu (II)…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The average change in the Cu−O bond length is 0.074 Å, and the average change in the Mayer bond order between 2 and 2+ is 0.09 (Table S1); thus, these differences in covalency and coupling result from the nature of the bridge in 2 versus 2+ being O 2− vs O •− , respectively, rather than structural differences. To emphasize the point, the Marcus reorganization energy (λ inner ) 81 of the 2 → 2 + oxidation (Table S2) was calculated (see Supporting Information) 82 and found to be 0.143 eV. This small value is on the order of the experimentally measured Fc → Fc + λ inner of ∼0.1 eV 83,84 and much smaller than the already small λ inner reported by Karlin and co-workers for [Cu (II)…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 79%
“…22 In the absence of the thiol layer, the DmFc 0/+ process is reported to have large k 0 (>1 cm/s) 23 and small λ (∼0.8 eV) values in dimethylformamide (0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate). 24 Importantly, the bulky methyl groups on the two cyclopentadienyl rings can minimize the probability of DmFc penetrating into the monolayer layer (pinhole effect). The use of FTACV provides access to data on a widely varying time scale from a single experiment, 25 which provides information needed (up to six harmonics) to distinguish the two models.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron transfer reaction associated with ferrocene (Fc) and derivatives such as DmFc represents a widely studied outer-sphere electron process . In the absence of the thiol layer, the DmFc 0/+ process is reported to have large k 0 (>1 cm/s) and small λ (∼0.8 eV) values in dimethylformamide (0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate ) . Importantly, the bulky methyl groups on the two cyclopentadienyl rings can minimize the probability of DmFc penetrating into the monolayer layer (pinhole effect).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 Another implicit solvent calculation study by Buda showed that values of 35%-100% can be observed for smaller organic molecules in various organic or aqueous solvents. 79 In contrast, the 𝜆 % /𝜆 values determined by experimental spectroscopy for 1 st -row transition metal ions in aqueous solution are in a significantly lower range of 11%-39%. 77 Despite the wide range of 𝜆 % /𝜆 values reported, most computational studies of 𝜆 % focus on a small set of systems, or use implicit solvent calculations based on geometry-optimized structures without configuration sampling, due to computational challenge in QM or QM/MM configuration sampling for a large number of explicitly solvated systems.…”
Section: Application On Reorganization Energy Calculationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This range is on the lower end of the abovementioned computational literature results, but the solutes investigated in our data set are different, and our calculations are based on explicit solvent configuration sampling instead of implicit solvent-based protocol. 70,79 In addition, the outer-sphere contributions in Fig. 10 could be overestimated due to using non-polarizable solvent force field, which often underestimates the impact of solvent polarization.…”
Section: Application On Reorganization Energy Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%