2016
DOI: 10.1075/rllt.9.04cas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On capacities and their epistemic extensions

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is twofold; first, we aim to provide a series of tests that identify Spanish ser capaz ‘be capable’ (henceforth SC) as an ambiguous modal, just like English must or can. Specifically, we observe that SC has not only an abilitative flavor, but also an epistemic one. Second, we want to propose an analysis for SC that can account for this ambiguity and that is in accordance with current theories of modality such as Cinque (1999), Kratzer (1981, 1991), and Hacquard (2009, 2010). In a nuts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both uses of SC share, though, a key meaning component, characterized as an unusual flavor in Castroviejo & Oltra-Massuet (2015b). As discussed in Castroviejo & Oltra-Massuet (2016: 33), in the abilitative, the prejacent cannot just describe a capacity, as in (9), but must express an unusual ability.…”
Section: (7)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both uses of SC share, though, a key meaning component, characterized as an unusual flavor in Castroviejo & Oltra-Massuet (2015b). As discussed in Castroviejo & Oltra-Massuet (2016: 33), in the abilitative, the prejacent cannot just describe a capacity, as in (9), but must express an unusual ability.…”
Section: (7)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In previous literature, and especially in Castroviejo & Oltra-Massuet (2015b;2016), two readings have been identified for SC, one that is purely abilitative, (2a) and (3a), and another one which does not seem to refer to generic abilities, and which has been referred to as epistemic, (2b) and (3b).…”
Section: Readings Of Scmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations