1981
DOI: 10.2307/2374219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Certain L-Functions

Abstract: and its Applications, and the Number Theory Foundation. Over 100 mathematicians attended, and there were 23 one-hour lectures. The conference focused on several aspects of the Langlands program, including some exposition of Shahidi's work, recent progress, and future avenues of investigation. Far from being a retrospective, the conference emphasized the vast array of significant problems ahead. All lecturers were invited to contribute material for this volume. In addition, some important figures who were unabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
333
0
8

Year Published

1983
1983
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(344 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
333
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore prove: Remark. This result is partially contained in Shahidi [15,Theorem 5.3]. Our proof is different.…”
Section: For Any Normalized Hecke Eigenform A(n)=12+(n(~)l)exp( Clogmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We therefore prove: Remark. This result is partially contained in Shahidi [15,Theorem 5.3]. Our proof is different.…”
Section: For Any Normalized Hecke Eigenform A(n)=12+(n(~)l)exp( Clogmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our proof is different. For our application, the fact that La(1)4:0 is crucial and this is not contained in [15].…”
Section: For Any Normalized Hecke Eigenform A(n)=12+(n(~)l)exp( Clogmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through (8.11) and the known holomorphy of E(s, f, g) on the line Re s = 0 (which follows from the general spectral analysis), one also obtains a new proof of the famous result that ζ(s) never vanishes along the line Re s = 1 (see [75], [120], [153], [161]). Among other things, this result is the key to the standard proof of the Prime Number Theorem -as was originally outlined by Riemann himself in [145]!…”
Section: Boundedness In Vertical Strips and Non-vanishingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There, analysis of the constant term and first Fourier coefficient already sufficed for the analytic continuation and functional equation of ζ(s) via Selberg's method. Langlands proposed studying the non-trivial Fourier coefficients in general, and Shahidi has now worked that theory out ( [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168]) along with Kim and others. In general it has been a difficult challenge to prove the L-functions arising in the constant terms and Fourier coefficients are entire.…”
Section: Langlands-shahidi (1967-)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall assume π is not monomial. It then follows that either Theorem 5.1 is proved by applying a version of converse theorems of Cogdell and Piatetski-Shapiro [10,11] to certain triple product L-functions L(s, (π 1 ⊠ π 2 ) × σ) whose analytic properties are obtained from the Langlands-Shahidi method [19,27,48,49,50,51,52].…”
Section: Corollary (52) Is a Consequence Of The Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%