1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1997)65:6<1065::aid-qua5>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On characterization of molecular surfaces

Abstract: We consider the problem of quantitative characterization of the molecular surface. We start with a set of matrices, the elements of which give interatomic separation and higher powers of the separations. Averaged row sums of individual matrices suitably normalized give molecular profiles. The problem that we consider is how to generalize this approach to 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional objects. By using a large number of random points distributed over the molecular surface or molecular volume, respectively, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other properties can be employed for other purposes. [11,12] Next, we define two relative indices d ij (=PK 2ij /PK 1ij ) and h ij (=ASA ij /Hy ij ), where i and j represent the four types of amino acids (i = 1, 2, 3,4) and the index for amino acid residues within each type, respectively.…”
Section: Spherical Coordinates Of Each Amino Acid According To Its mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other properties can be employed for other purposes. [11,12] Next, we define two relative indices d ij (=PK 2ij /PK 1ij ) and h ij (=ASA ij /Hy ij ), where i and j represent the four types of amino acids (i = 1, 2, 3,4) and the index for amino acid residues within each type, respectively.…”
Section: Spherical Coordinates Of Each Amino Acid According To Its mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, how to represent protein or DNA sequences mathematically to capture their intrinsic features is an active area of research, with statistical methods and graphical representations as two main approaches. [1][2][3][4] Compared to statistical methods, graphical representations are more intuitive and simpler to calculate. Recent studies indicate that they are useful for identification of essential genes and characterization of protein properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because matrix elements of D/D matrix are smaller than one, or at most equal to one, when considering higher powers of their elements there is no need to introduce appropriate normalizing factor to ensure convergence of its eigenvalues. The k D/ k D matrices were also applied to non-chain structures, such as smaller molecules, ring systems, polyhedra and molecular surfaces [53][54][55]. In these systems, the leading eigenvalue can be interpreted as a measure of the compactness of a system, because in more compact systems the Euclidean distances will be relatively small and consequently the bounds on the leading eigenvalue will be decreased, implying thus that smaller magnitudes for the leading eigenvalue will characterize more compact systems.…”
Section: Matrix Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research until 1996, including Connolly's dot surface,35, 36 the overlapped multiple spheres method of Gibson and Scheraga,30 the parametric representations of Duncan and Olson,37 etc., have been generally reviewed by Connolly 38. Afterward, many new approaches have also been proposed 19–26, 39–61. Pomelli et al19–21 presented the DefPOL program, which is more efficient than GEPOL62–64 to describe the solvent effects on molecular system of large size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%