1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01933712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On chebyshev quadrature for a special class of weight functions

Abstract: Abstract.Recently Gautschi [5] has proved that the weight functions w e defined byw~(x) = '. 0 elsewhere , 0 < ~ < 1 are the only symmetric ones, apart from the Chebyshev weight function, for which there exists for every even n a Chebyshev rule in the strict sense, having n nodes and Gaussian degree 2n-1. In this note we show that for an odd number n of nodes the maximum degree of Chebyshev-type rules for we has a completely different behavior from that for even n.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second statement of the corollary follows immediately by Corollary 3. , 1), does not admit T -q for odd n since the maximum degree of exactness is of order In n, a result which has been shown in [3] by a completely different approach. Thus the question arises whether there is a distribution function at all admitting T-q on a set of several intervals which is symmetric with respect to zero and does not contain the point zero.…”
Section: Admits (M(nk) Nk Da) T--q For Each Ken and That The Nodes mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second statement of the corollary follows immediately by Corollary 3. , 1), does not admit T -q for odd n since the maximum degree of exactness is of order In n, a result which has been shown in [3] by a completely different approach. Thus the question arises whether there is a distribution function at all admitting T-q on a set of several intervals which is symmetric with respect to zero and does not contain the point zero.…”
Section: Admits (M(nk) Nk Da) T--q For Each Ken and That The Nodes mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). Furthermore let us note that the constant given in [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] is not so precise than that one given in the next theorem. we get with the help of (3.6) and ( …”
Section: Admits (M(nk) Nk Da) T--q For Each Ken and That The Nodes mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proof of this theorem uses general theorems of Peherstorfer [21] and Förster and Ostermeyer [10] which, when taken together, show that d n (σ ) may rise at most logarithmically in n for odd n whenever σ is a symmetric measure having 0 outside its support. We remark also that the phenomenon that d n (σ ) may have very different orders of magnitude for odd and even n was first discovered, in a particular case, by Förster [9].…”
Section: Lower Boundsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The bounds (10) and (11) follow directly from the bounds (8) and (9) and the definitions of d n (σ 0 ), n 0 σ 0 (k) and n σ 0 (k). The bound (8) follows from Bernstein's Theorem 1.2 on replicating the Chebyshev-type quadrature given by the upper bound of that theorem to each of the two intervals in the support of σ 0 .…”
Section: Lower Bounds For the Number Of Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For odd n := 2m + 1, however, one has for all Chebyshev-type rules Qrm+ 1 the inequality (6) deg(Q~m+ 1 ) < const -In m (see [3]), which indicates that, in this case, the cost of obtaining minimal variance increases exponentially. On the other hand, by the Theorem, minimal variance can be obtained asymptotically, even with the condition of maximal degree deg(Q,) = 2n-1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%