2011
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2011.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-chip tensile testing of nanoscale silicon free-standing beams

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the dimensions of our bridges (≥30 nm), we achieved comparable tensile strength, though our NWs were fabricated using a top down approach. This fracture strength (~7.6 GPa) is also equivalent to those obtained in top down fabricated Si NWs from defect free SOI using external actuators 25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For the dimensions of our bridges (≥30 nm), we achieved comparable tensile strength, though our NWs were fabricated using a top down approach. This fracture strength (~7.6 GPa) is also equivalent to those obtained in top down fabricated Si NWs from defect free SOI using external actuators 25 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In order to extract the Young's modulus as well as the fracture strain of the deposited polySi layer, on-chip tensile test structures have been manufactured. The principle and process of the preparation of samples are elab- orated in [34][35][36][37][38][39]. During the tensile test there are no longer interactions between the substrate and the film.…”
Section: Experimental Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulation results (fracture strength and strain) are compared with corresponding experiments. In the experiments, the films have been tested freestanding by etching the underneath sacrificial layer [34][35][36][37][38][39] so that they undergo pure uniaxial tension conditions. A plane-stress condition is thus considered in the 2D-numerical simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted Ê in the extensional mode is different from the one extracted in the bending mode [16]. Consequently, there are two types of experimental characterizations: those measuring Ê in the extensional mode, such as uniaxial tensile loading tests [41,42,9], and those in the bending mode such as resonance frequency based [6] tests or bending tests inside an atomic force microscopes [10,11]. Most of the research today focuses on the bending mode of Ê because it is more sensitive to surface stress and surface elasticity effects and because of its importance in sensing and actuating applications.…”
Section: Scale-dependencementioning
confidence: 99%