2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-015-0036-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On choosing the location of the sources in the MFS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed that placing the source points on a circle leads to poor results and recommended pseudo boundaries similar to the main boundary of the problem. Chen et al [Chen, Karageorghis and Li (2016)] investigated on the configuration of source points in the MFS for 2D and 3D boundary value problems governed by the Laplace and biharmonic equations. They used an optimization algorithm based on the accuracy of the imposition of boundary conditions for proper determination of the location of source points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that placing the source points on a circle leads to poor results and recommended pseudo boundaries similar to the main boundary of the problem. Chen et al [Chen, Karageorghis and Li (2016)] investigated on the configuration of source points in the MFS for 2D and 3D boundary value problems governed by the Laplace and biharmonic equations. They used an optimization algorithm based on the accuracy of the imposition of boundary conditions for proper determination of the location of source points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a promising result of the location of the source points for the proposed method in this study, a sensitivity study was first carried out. An algorithm similar to the study conducted by Chen et al [31] was adopted with scaling of the artificial boundary with the domain size. Assuming the boundary collocation points can be described as a known parametric representation as follows:…”
Section: Validation Of the Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such problems involving regions of irregular geometry, the use of numerical methods, particularly the boundary-type meshless method, to approximate numerical solutions is advantageous. In the past decades, several meshless methods have been proposed, such as the collocation Trefftz method (CTM) [28][29][30][31], the method of fundamental solutions (MFS) [32][33][34], smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) [35], diffuse element method [36], and the boundary particle method [37]. Among these meshless methods, the CTM can be categorized into the boundary-type meshless method and provides the most accurate solutions with optimal numerical stability [38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%