2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On closed-section wind-tunnel aeroacoustic experiments with a two-dimensional lifting body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest disagreement between computation and experiment is observed for case olAα8. Although the reason for this difference is still not clear, it may be related to excessive suction of the wind tunnel wall boundary layer, which was set based on the main-element spanwise pressure distribution (Amaral et al 2019). However, the qualitative effect of the angle of attack on the frequency and amplitude of the narrowband peaks is captured by the simulation.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Results To Computational Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greatest disagreement between computation and experiment is observed for case olAα8. Although the reason for this difference is still not clear, it may be related to excessive suction of the wind tunnel wall boundary layer, which was set based on the main-element spanwise pressure distribution (Amaral et al 2019). However, the qualitative effect of the angle of attack on the frequency and amplitude of the narrowband peaks is captured by the simulation.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Results To Computational Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect was circumvented in the reference experiments with the use of beamforming which can remove the image sources from the region of integration of the sources (Amaral et al. 2019). In the simulations, the sound is obtained only from sources on the model surface, which also does not take into account the images that could be produced by the boundaries of the computational domain.…”
Section: Unsteady Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the use of wind-tunnel boundary layer control to provide the average flow more twodimensional on the airfoil, thus reducing uncertainties on the wing effective angle of attack [32]. However, no such treatments were used in the present study, so the results are presented for the tested geometric angle of attack in the low-turbulence wind-tunnel facility at the University of Bristol.…”
Section: Airfoil and Wind-tunnel Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%