I am very privileged to be here today at the conclusion of my three-year term as program chair, president, and immediate past-president to share with you my reflections about CAE and the field of anthropology of education. I am humbled by this honor and the unique opportunity to lead the organization along with my fellow colleagues at the executive committee during these crucial times. In reviewing some of the lectures of those that preceded me, I learned that this speech is intended to be a very brief presidential address that "both reflects on the field and prognosticates on the future of the field" (Gonzalez, 2010). Today, I would like to follow that tradition. However, I would also like to address some of the concerns from last year's conference. These concerns relate to both our organization and the field of anthropology of education.I reviewed historical documents ranging from the report of the famous Northern California (Carmel) meeting in 1955 to the creation of CAE and its affiliation to AAA in the mid-1980s. I reviewed the transition of the CAE's newsletter to the AEQ journal, and I examined some of the major themes present within both the Council and the field of anthropology of education. I needed to understand the past in order to make sense of the present.In this lecture, I will first address the issue of scholarly identity and the field's historical search for the sociocultural context of the educative process; second, I will address the issue of transdisciplinarity in anthropology of education; and third, I will conclude this speech by reflecting on both the ways CAE continues advancing our mission but also on the challenges that CAE faces ahead.
Scholarly Identity and Spindler's Quest for Sociocultural ContextualizationThe themes of scholarly identity and the search for sociocultural contextualization of the educative process (Spindler, 1984, p. 6) have pervaded the literature in the field of anthropology of education since its inception. However, before discussing both themes, I need to share with you my positionality-the particular history and perspective that I bring to this task and the biases I carry.I am the oldest of six children from a working-class family. My parents did not finish high school but they worked very hard to give their children a very privileged education. They saw education as a vehicle for social mobility, and they worked several jobs to give their children the chances they did not have. I grew up in Nicaragua during some of the most violent times in the entire region. I became a human rights attorney because this was the least I could do for a nation that was bleeding under the forty-year reign of one of the most horrible US-sponsored dictatorships. Young people were being slaughtered. Being young and hopeful was a crime and a symptom of rebellion-enough to become part of the list of the disappeared. This is how I began my human rights career: searching for people whose families had reported them as missing, filing habeas corpus petitions for those who had been unjustly ...