2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02638378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On commuting automorphisms of groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we proved that for any prime and for all integers there exists a non-, p-group of order . [3]. Further, the authors in [4] have proved that the inner automorphisms which belong to are precisely the inner automorphisms which are induced by 2-Engel elements.…”
Section: An Automorphism Of Is Called a Commuting Automorphism If Formentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we proved that for any prime and for all integers there exists a non-, p-group of order . [3]. Further, the authors in [4] have proved that the inner automorphisms which belong to are precisely the inner automorphisms which are induced by 2-Engel elements.…”
Section: An Automorphism Of Is Called a Commuting Automorphism If Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We denote the set of all commuting automorphisms of by It seems tha t for the first time, the commuting automorphisms are defined, in various rings(see [1], [5] and [10]). Deaconsecu, Silberberg and Walls in [3] showed that even though h as a number of group properties, it does not necessarily form a subgroup of . A group is called -group if the set forms a subgroup of .…”
Section: An Automorphism Of Is Called a Commuting Automorphism If Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, Deaconescu, Silberberg and Walls proved that the set A(G) is not always a subgroup of Aut(G) but it has many of the properties of a group (see [5]). Definition 1.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of automorphisms were first studied for various classes of rings [1,9,11]. M. Desconesco and G. Silberbers [7] proved that A(G) do not necessarily form a subgroup of Aut(G). We also recall that a central automorphism of a group…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%