2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics 2008
DOI: 10.1109/indin.2008.4618111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On comparisons of the ISaGRAF implementation of IEC 61499 with FBDK and other implementations

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents first results of comparison of ISaGRAF implementation of IEC 61499 with that of FBDK -the tool traditionally used for experiments with this standard in the research community.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be expected that the execution results will differ much from other tools. A more comprehensive comparison between ISaGRAF and FBDK can be found in [30]. …”
Section: ) Event Clearance Rule and Ec Transition Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be expected that the execution results will differ much from other tools. A more comprehensive comparison between ISaGRAF and FBDK can be found in [30]. …”
Section: ) Event Clearance Rule and Ec Transition Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the reason, according to [1], for the appearance of several proposals for the execution of IEC 61499 based applications. The synchronous model of execution [2], the cyclic model of execution [25] (see [1,25]), and the ISaGRAF model [20], which is considered close to the cyclic model, are given as examples of this kind of implementation, that is characterized as a cyclic execution model. Moreover, it is claimed that "these models "bend" a bit the fundamental concepts of eventdriven invocation, implemented in the pure event-driven implementations, such as FBRT and FORTE. "…”
Section: Observations On Determinism and Event Drivenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, FBRT is not based on the event-driven paradigm, since it implements the event connections between FB instances, as method invocations, and this is why, as also claimed in [20], it cannot be regarded as a reference implementation. Example implementations based on the event-driven paradigm are described in [24,26].…”
Section: Observations On Determinism and Event Drivenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBEM is inspired by the cyclic execution model presented in [17]. In CBEM, an application step function executes the function block instances in a predefined order where each function block instance is given a turn on the execution resource to handle its input events.…”
Section: Cyclic Buffered Execution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%