2010
DOI: 10.1134/s0361768810020106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On computation of Boolean involutive bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The involutive algorithm most frequently executes operations on base objects (monomials and polynomi als) [8]; consequently, these operations take the most processor time. The package BIBasis for the REDUCE system (like other implementations of the involutive algorithm considered in this study) uses a sparse dis tributive representation for both monomials and poly nomials.…”
Section: Implementation and Representation Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The involutive algorithm most frequently executes operations on base objects (monomials and polynomi als) [8]; consequently, these operations take the most processor time. The package BIBasis for the REDUCE system (like other implementations of the involutive algorithm considered in this study) uses a sparse dis tributive representation for both monomials and poly nomials.…”
Section: Implementation and Representation Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, two versions of a Boolean involu tive algorithm using the Janet and Pommaret divisions have been developed [6][7][8], implemented, and used for computing Boolean Gröbner bases. The practice of C++ implementations of these versions shows that the Pommaret division based algorithm is more advanta geous; unlike the involutive algorithm in a ring of polynomials with rational coefficients, where the Janet division is more preferable, and the use of the Pommaret division may lead to an infinite basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%