2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2007.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On computation of NPMLE for middle-censored data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed scheme can be considered as a special case of the middle censoring model which was introduced by Jammalamadaka and Mangalam [9] for which all random intervals are the same. The later plan is also studied by Jammalamadaka and Iyer [10] and Mangalam et al [11] in the non-parametric set-up and Iyer et al [2] in the parametric set-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The proposed scheme can be considered as a special case of the middle censoring model which was introduced by Jammalamadaka and Mangalam [9] for which all random intervals are the same. The later plan is also studied by Jammalamadaka and Iyer [10] and Mangalam et al [11] in the non-parametric set-up and Iyer et al [2] in the parametric set-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They proved that the NPMLE is always a self-consistent estimator (SCE) (Tarpey & Flury, 1996). Some rigorous treatments of this censoring scheme are found in Jammalamadaka & Iyer (2004), Iyer et al (2008), Mangalam et al (2008), Jammalamadaka & Mangalam (2009), Shen (2010Shen ( , 2011, Davarzani & Parsian (2011) and Davarzani et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They established the asymptotic properties ofF 0 S and provided an upper bound of the difference between F 0 and F 0 0 . Mangalam et al (2008) showed that under condition (A) every censoring interval contains at least one uncensored observation, i.e. d i ¼ 0 implies that there exists j such that d j ¼ 1 and X j 2 ðU i ,V i Þ, the solution of Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.3) will be unique, and as a consequenceF n will be equal to an NPMLE. Mangalam et al (2008) proposed a technique for obtaining the NPMLE by dividing the original problem into subproblems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%