1997
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-63138-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On computing all maximal cliques distributedly

Abstract: A distributed algorithm is presented for generating all maximal cIiques in a network graph, based on the sequential version of Tsukiyama et al. [TIAS77]. The time complexity of the proposed approach is restricted to the induced neighborhood of a node, and the communication complexity is O(md) where m is the number of connections, and d is the maximum degree in the graph. Messages are O(log n) bits long, where n is the number of nodes (processors) in the system. As an appIication, a distributed algorithm for co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Klein [21], Naor et al [25], Ho and Lee [18] present parallel algorithms for this problem for Chordal Graphs. Distributed algorithms for this problem are presented by Jennings and Motyckova [19] for network graphs and by Protti et al [26] for general graphs. An approximation algorithm is presented by Gupta et al [17] for unit disk graphs.…”
Section: Motivation and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klein [21], Naor et al [25], Ho and Lee [18] present parallel algorithms for this problem for Chordal Graphs. Distributed algorithms for this problem are presented by Jennings and Motyckova [19] for network graphs and by Protti et al [26] for general graphs. An approximation algorithm is presented by Gupta et al [17] for unit disk graphs.…”
Section: Motivation and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was developed for sociological applications and has many extensions [4]. F. Protti et al developed a distributed algorithm to compute all maximal cliques [5], and B. Wu et al realized their theoretical distributed method in MapReduce computing model and effectively utilized its execution mechanism [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of deciding whether a graph G is a clique‐inverse graph of Fp, when p is a constant, can be solved in polynomial time [13]. This can be easily seen by observing that if GK1(MJX-tex-caligraphicscriptFp) then each vertex of G is in at most p − 1 maximal cliques, that is, G contains at most ( p − 1) n maximal cliques; then, K ( G ) can be determined in polynomial time by using any polynomial‐delay algorithm for the generation of the maximal cliques of a graph, for example [11]. In addition, checking whether the clique number of K ( G ) is at most p − 1 amounts to analyzing all the (np) subsets of K ( G ) with p vertices, where n = ∣ V ( K ( G ))∣.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%