2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75647-9_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Conditions for Weak Conservativeness of Regularized Explicit Finite-Difference Schemes for 1D Barotropic Gas Dynamics Equations

Abstract: We consider explicit two-level three-point in space finite-difference schemes for solving 1D barotropic gas dynamics equations. The schemes are based on special quasi-gasdynamic and quasi-hydrodynamic regularizations of the system. We linearize the schemes on a constant solution and derive the von Neumann type necessary condition and a CFL type criterion (necessary and sufficient condition) for weak conservativeness in L 2 for the corresponding initial-value problem on the whole line. The criterion is essentia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the QHD regularization, these 2D and 3D results are derived for the first time and, for the QGD regularization, they improve those that have recently been obtained in [29]. Previously, the L 2 -dissipativity analysis of similar schemes in the much simpler 1D barotropic case was accomplished for zero and any Mach number in [30][31][32], respectively. In this paper, we base on the papers in [29,32] and aim to develop further their technique.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the QHD regularization, these 2D and 3D results are derived for the first time and, for the QGD regularization, they improve those that have recently been obtained in [29]. Previously, the L 2 -dissipativity analysis of similar schemes in the much simpler 1D barotropic case was accomplished for zero and any Mach number in [30][31][32], respectively. In this paper, we base on the papers in [29,32] and aim to develop further their technique.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…where b (0) = min 1 k n b k and b (1) = 1. As max 1 k n q(|M k |) max 0 m M q(M), for = 0, condition (31) is more sharp than the second condition (37), whereas for = 1 they coincide.…”
Section: We Can Write Downmentioning
confidence: 92%