2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2015.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On conjugacy of Cartan subalgebras in extended affine Lie algebras

Abstract: That finite-dimensional simple Lie algebras over the complex numbers can be classified by means of purely combinatorial and geometric objects such as Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams and indecomposable irreducible root systems, is arguably one of the most elegant results in mathematics. The definition of the root system is done by fixing a Cartan subalgebra of the given Lie algebra. The remarkable fact is that (up to isomorphism) this construction is independent of the choice of the Cartan subalgebra. The modern way of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case where is the field of rational functions in one variable over a field and consists of the discrete valuations corresponding to all irreducible polynomials was considered by Raghunathan and Ramanathan [RR84] (see also [CGP12, Theorem 2.1]): their result implies that if is a (connected) semi-simple group over and is obtained from by the base change , then any -form that splits over (where is a separable closure of ) and has good reduction at all is obtained by base change from a certain -form of . In the same notation, a description of the -forms of that (split over and) have good reduction at all was obtained by Chernousov, Gille and Pianzola [CGP12], which played a crucial role in the proof of the conjugacy of the analogues of Cartan subalgebras in certain infinite-dimensional Lie algebras [CNPY16]. (We note that if has characteristic zero, then every semi-simple -group becomes quasi-split over , which implies that those that have good reduction at all automatically split over .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case where is the field of rational functions in one variable over a field and consists of the discrete valuations corresponding to all irreducible polynomials was considered by Raghunathan and Ramanathan [RR84] (see also [CGP12, Theorem 2.1]): their result implies that if is a (connected) semi-simple group over and is obtained from by the base change , then any -form that splits over (where is a separable closure of ) and has good reduction at all is obtained by base change from a certain -form of . In the same notation, a description of the -forms of that (split over and) have good reduction at all was obtained by Chernousov, Gille and Pianzola [CGP12], which played a crucial role in the proof of the conjugacy of the analogues of Cartan subalgebras in certain infinite-dimensional Lie algebras [CNPY16]. (We note that if has characteristic zero, then every semi-simple -group becomes quasi-split over , which implies that those that have good reduction at all automatically split over .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume that H is a structure MAD of E. By [CNPY,Corollary 3.2] the core E c =L⊕C of E does not depend on the choice of the EALA structure on E. Therefore, by [Ne2,Theorem 6] the image π(H ∩E c ) under the projection map π:E c →L is a k-ad-diagonalizable subalgebra of L which is the 0-component of some Lie torus structure on L. It follows from Lemma 2.5 that π(H ∩E c )=k·s. By one of the axioms of the Lie torus there exists an sl 2 -triple in L of the form (e, f, γs), for some γ ∈k.…”
Section: Uladzimir Yahoraumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our construction is a special case of [CNPY,1.4]. Thus, by [CNPY,1.5], the vector space E together with the product (1.2.3) is a Lie algebra.…”
Section: Interlaced Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our construction is a special case of [CNPY,1.4]. Thus, by [CNPY,1.5], the vector space E together with the product (1.2.3) is a Lie algebra. Since it is obtained by interlacing the central extension 0 → C → L ⊕ C → L → 0 (obvious maps) with the abelian extension 0 → C → C ⊕ D → D → 0 (again obvious maps) we call this Lie algebra the interlaced extension given by the data (L, β, D, C, τ ) and denote it IE(L, D, C) or IE(L, β, D, C, τ ) if more precision is helpful.…”
Section: Interlaced Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation